The cervical area of the tooth
interfaces with the gingiva just above the cementoenamel junction and creates a
unique biologic junction. This region can be altered by gingival disease
as well as tooth destructive processes. Periodontal inflammation and
toothbrush trauma may combine to cause recession. Intensive toothbrushing
and concentrated dentifrices can then result in abrasion of the tooth.
This process is intensified by the presence of acidic PHs from environmental
factors like soft drinks, gastric disease or reduced salivary flow. This
abrasion, aided by erosive factors, is but one of several pathological processes
affecting the dentogingival junction. In this issue we examine the four
pathological conditions that affect the tooth-gingival interface.
Understanding the origins of these problems increases the likelihood of
successful treatment. The following table lists the four conditions that
most often create cervical tooth structure loss along with the definition and
clinical appearance of the lesions.
|
Erosion |
Progressive loss of hard dental tissue by
chemical processes not involving bacterial action. |
Broad cupping of smooth surface enamel, wear
on non-occluding surfaces, "raised amalgams," enamel
"cuff" persists in gingival crevice. |
|
Abrasion |
Loss by wear of dental tissue caused by
abrasion by foreign substances (for example, toothbrushing and/or
dentifrices) |
Usually located at cervical areas, wider than
deep lesion, premolars and cuspids commonly affected. |
|
Abfraction |
Loss of tooth surface at the cervical areas
of teeth caused by compressive and tensile forces during tooth flexure. |
Affects buccal/labial surfaces, deep narrow
v-shaped notch, commonly affects single teeth with occlusal alloys and
eccentric loads. |
|
Resorption |
Loss of root surface tissue by uncontrolled
inflammation of the soft tissues, usually of unknown origin. |
Associated with trauma, orthodontic care,
stress and internal bleaching of endo treated teeth, sometimes erodes CEJ
area causing "pink spot" |
Erosion is the condition most
easily diagnosed in its pure state. Prevalence studies, conducted largely
in Europe suggest the incidence of this entity to range from 5% to 25%, with a
significant presence in children aged 5-14. The presence of an enamel
"cuff" apical to the free gingival margin is pathognomonic and
represents the fact that the gingiva somehow protects against the tooth
dissolution process. Erosion is caused by extrinsic or intrinsic sources
of acid that do not penetrate the gingival sulcus. Extrinsic sources are
carbonated drinks, sports drinks, fruits, fruit juices and acid inducing
medications. Intrinsic acids are most commonly associated with gastric
regurgitation. Diseases that are associated with this condition include
GERD (gastro esophageal reflux disease), bulimia, anorexia nervosa, diabetes and
alcoholism. Not only do these conditions increase the acid content of the
mouth, but the medications used to treat them often result in reduced salivary
flow. Patients with erosion have been found to have lower acid buffering
capacity in saliva than control groups. Salivary flow is an important
factor in the etiology of erosion. Erosion is best managed through the
control of acid pH inducing factors, improving the buffering capacity of saliva
through increased flow and remineralization of remaining enamel. Large
degrees of dentin exposure invite secondary caries. Many situations
necessitate full coverage restorations when dentin exposure is extensive or
sensitivity develops.
In contrast to lesions that are
primarily erosion, abrasion lesions are broad and involve the cementoenamel
junction. Enamel surfaces may be worn to a smooth transition to dentin,
losing the definitive cervical bulge of enamel. Cervical areas can be
hard, with what appears to be sclerotic dentin. If the buffering capacity
of saliva is low, or acid concentration in the mouth is high, secondary caries
can develop in the area of prior recession. The root surface portion of
these lesions can be treated with root coverage procedures such as connective
tissue grafts. However, the portion of the abrasion which involves enamel
coronal to the interproximal bone is unlikely to be resolved by surgical
care. If esthetics is a significant consideration, the coronal portion of
such a lesion would need to be restored with a resin bonded restoration.
Gingival coverage of the dentin prior to restoration reduces the problems
associated with retention of dentin bonded restorations and tooth sensitivity.
In 1991, Grippo coined the term
"abfraction" to describe v-shaped notches in the cervical region of
the tooth, which he attributed to the presence of occlusal loads on the teeth.
Since that time, various researchers have demonstrated the presence of v-shaped
notches on one tooth in a segment, but not in other teeth in the segment or at
different angles than adjoining teeth. This reduces the probability that
these lesions are toothbrush initiated. In 1998, Rees published a two
dimensional finite analysis of tooth stress. He found that the presence of
an occlusal restoration greatly increased the stress on the cervical enamel,
raising the stress above the level needed for enamel rod fracture. Whitehead
showed in laboratory conditions, that natural bicuspids placed under axial loads
in low pH environments developed non-carious cervical lesions. Mayhew, in
a clinical study of abfractive lesions, found that 95% of cervical lesions
correlated with facet wear on the occlusal surfaces. A high percentage of
the teeth noted to have abfractive lesions had occlusal restorations. It
has been suggested that bonding failures in Class V restorations may be related
in many cases to increased loads on the cervical area from loads spread
secondary to bruxism or increased function. Clinicians have experienced
the effect of cuspal flexure in a different way that may support this
idea. When bonded restorations are placed in large bulk rather than incrementally
built along lateral preparation walls, the cusps may be pulled towards the
center of the shrinkage that occurs with light polymerization. The patient
develops discomfort from the occlusal stresses deforming the dentin after
restoration. Occlusal adjustment or replacing the restoration are
necessary to eliminate the sensitivity. When cusps are loaded occlusally
and the load is transmitted to the cervical region the enamel may undergo
microfracture or the existing restoration may be lost. It is interesting
to note that the loss of periodontal support moves the stress concentration
apically on the tooth, off the cervical enamel. Periodontally involved
teeth seem to have less abfractive lesions and progression of these lesions is
lessened. These non-carious lesions are best managed through restoration
as many are confined to enamel. However, deep lesions involving the dentin
may be candidates for soft tissue augmentation.
In distinction to abfraction,
cervical root resorption is an inflammatory process. It occurs just below
the epithelial attachment, whether the epithelial attachment is at the CEJ of on
root surface. Cervical root resorption occurs as a delayed reaction to
trauma and can be seen following tooth movement, orthognathic surgery,
periodontal care, trauma and non-vital bleaching. The cause is unknown,
but most authorities suggest an alteration in the root surface which does not
resist cementoclasts when inflammation develops near the affected surface.
Spread of the root resorption undermines the cervical enamel producing a
"pink spot," similar to the process of internal resorption. These
lesions are asymptomatic, and often they are misdiagnosed as periodontal
vertical deformities in their early stages. External resorption shows on
radiographs and is different than internal resorption as the pulp chamber's
outline remains clearly distinguishable in external resorptioin. When
these lesions are exposed surgically, a band of intense inflammatory tissue
surrounds the lesion. The recommended method of treatment is surgical
exposure and debridement of the lesion with endodontic therapy when the lesion
approaches the pulpal tissues. The exposed lesion is restored beyond the
margins of the resorption as far as tooth structure allows. Left untreated
the process destroys so much tooth structure that the tooth is not
restorable. Some lesions continue to destroy tooth structure after
restorative care so patients need to be appraised of a future risk for
breakdown.